Which type of statement suggests that someone might be foolish enough to accept a blatant falsehood?

A sarcastic statement often implies an underlying meaning that contradicts the literal interpretation. When someone uses sarcasm, they may say something that appears to be genuine but is actually meant to mock or criticize a particular idea or behavior. In this context, a sarcastic statement can suggest that accepting a blatant falsehood is foolish by highlighting the absurdity of the situation. The tone and delivery typical in sarcasm can effectively convey disbelief or disdain toward someone who might credulously accept a false claim, thereby enhancing the critique of their gullibility.

The other response options do not carry the same nuanced implication. A ridiculous statement can denote something clearly unreasonable or silly but does not suggest a deeper critique of intelligence. A foolish declaration implies a lack of wisdom or sense but lacks the ironic tone that sarcasm embodies. An absurd comment refers to something nonsensical without necessarily implying ridicule or sarcasm. Thus, the most fitting choice for indicating that someone might be foolish enough to accept blatant falsehoods is the sarcastic statement.